Contemporary Moral Problems (ETHICSOC 185M, POLISCI 134P)

PHIL
72
Instructors
Mapps, M. (PI)
Section Number
1
In this course, we will discuss the body as a site of moral and political conflict. Here are a few of the questions that will be explored: People are encouraged to become kidney donors, but we still don't have enough kidneys for everybody who needs one. Should you be allowed to sell a kidney? Suppose Robert is dying of a rare disease and the only thing that could save his life is a bone marrow transplant from his cousin David, but David doesn't want to donate. Should we force him to "donate"? Some people say a woman should be free to make abortion decisions on whatever grounds she wants, including prenatal genetic testing for conditions like Down syndrome; others condemn such selective abortion as an unacceptable form of eugenics. What genetic testing information, if any, should be allowed to influence a woman's decision about whether to terminate a pregnancy? In addition to these normative questions, we will also study related questions in constitutional law. When the Supreme Court decided that abortion was a constitutional right in Roe v. Wade, on what legal reasoning did they base their decision? When they decided to overturn Roe in the recent Dobbs v. Jackson, what legal reasoning did they use then? How will Dobbs affect other (current) constitutional rights?
Grading
Letter or Credit/No Credit
Requirements
GER:EC-EthicReas, WAY-ER
Units
4-5
Academic Career
Undergraduate
Course Tags
Contemporary Issues
Academic Year
Quarter
Spring
Section Days
Tuesday Thursday
Start Time
10:30 AM
End Time
11:50 AM
Location
STLC 104